I'm not sure if this is your idea of the future of cricket. It certainly isn't mine. Having said that, the Indian Premier League is a major victory for what Lalit Modi likes to term "free market economics". We understand the term and we understand how it works when it comes to deciding insanely high prices, which are based on even crazier speculative bids, for cricketers who are supposed to be inhumanly talented. And in a fair sense, one would really have to be a socialist or communist to not appreciate all of this.
But, serious questions need to be asked if the mad moolah that dominated the recent IPL auctions will take away what matters most - the beauty and variety of the game. The IPL is about a fast, quickfire, TV friendly format of cricket - the T20. In other words, it is about marketing a game that's slam-bang in variety and caters to the low attention span cricket viewer. Assuming that the market does exist for this variety, what could be the long-term consequences of the league?
Classically, Test cricket is still hallowed territory for the game and this is where batsmen and bowlers have an even chance of being successful. In my books, I find it tough to compare a Test scenario involving Sachin Tendulkar grinding it out in the heat against a steaming Brett Lee on a seaming Perth wicket or a Anil Kumble weaving his spell on a 5th day turning pitch Vs. a T20 scenario of MSD or Symonds hitting poor Piyush Chawla for sixes on a flat pitch. Yes, cricket needs the thrill and excitement but an even contest over 5 days on a sporting wicket is the true test of a cricketer's character. A free market economist would say "Let Test Cricket die a natural death". I'd probably say cricket will die in the process.
What does IPL mean for the smaller cricketing nations? A lot of players from smaller nations go to build up numbers and make quick cash in these leagues. Nations like Sri Lanka and New Zealand already have a very small player base to choose from. In other words, the national teams sometimes lose out on availability of players. Bottom line : The IPL needs to be sanctioned and controlled by cricket's governing body like a dog on a leash.
Does the IPL bode well for younger players? Yes and No. The IPL is a tremendous opportunity for under-21s to play with some of the best in a world. But one could also argue that the slog variety of the game is not apt for development of technique. One may get to see a lot of Dhonis enter the world stage, but not everyone may survive without adequate first class experience. The IPL is not a panacea for world cricket. On the contrary, it needs to be viewed as a sideshow that makes a lot of money.
What about corruption? Match fixing? No one's talking about it with all the money involved, just yet. Stringent rules being enforced and constant monitoring of inter franchise transfers is necessary.
Time will tell.
I can almost imagine MSD getting introduced to his to-be in-laws by his girlfriend who says :
"Honey, whaddaya do for money? "
To which, MSD scratches his head and replies :
"It was Chennai till Thursday, yesterday I think I got transferred to Mumbai....Or was it Kolkata?"
Now that's insane.