Microfinance initiatives in India are being seen as the next big thing in terms of inclusive growth. In terms of inclusive growth, any microfinance organization aims to provide financial services to rural poor (part of the informal economy) in a way that they can afford it and pay for it. Theoretically, the rural poor are being made to participate in the economy and partake of it.
The biggest challenge to microfinance initiatives, like any other enterprise, is to get return on investment. Typically such an initiative would function in many ways similar to a bank. However, the biggest challenge comes from pushing the poor to have enough savings and assets to repay their loans. The cost of financial transactions incurred can be recovered if the net savings go up. In the event that the net savings are low, any asset that the poor have is placed as collateral so that they can repay these loans. As is the case in India, rural poor save by funding their own enterprises or selling their produce to retailers/middlemen. Typically such savings go on to repay their loans over a long period of time. Yet, it seems to me that the business model is such that microfinance initiatives would stand to make a lot more profit if land/property rights were granted across states in India.
Around 28% of India's population lives below a common denomination called the poverty line. Around 60% of India engages in agriculture which only contributes 28% to the GDP. Land use is inefficient and often land ownership is ambiguous because of title disputes and a feudal history.
Amidst all this, one wonders that if the rural poor got land ownership rights and title deeds, such land could well be used for other purposes or even as secure collateral. This is certainly no pipe dream, considering initiatives of this kind have succeeded in a couple of states across India, particularly Gujarat. In this enlightening article, Swaminathan Iyer(of Swaminomics fame) writes :
"Yet, in one state, SEZs are coming up rapidly, with no agitations, no disputes - and hence no newspaper headlines! This is Gujarat. It already has five functioning SEZs, with 12 more ready to start in 2008.
The Gulf of Kutch is the only coastal area in India with low rainfall. Farming is tough, so farmers are willing to sell their land. The state government itself owns vast wastelands, mud flats and marshes along the coast. It has been selling these to developers (like Gautam Adani at Mundra), without displacing farmers.
Even in central Gujarat, where land quality is high, farmers have proved willing to sell. The pharmaceutical SEZ of Zydus Cadila has acquired 110 hectares, paying around Rs 10 lakh/acre. In other states, industrialists say they cannot get contiguous land through voluntary purchases: a few farmers will refuse to sell. The experience in Gujarat is that even farmers who say no initially will say yes if offered a sufficiently high price. Developers should pay this very high price to a few farmers and get on with the job. Why look to the state government for acquisition, which takes two years or more? Time saved is money saved."
As Iyer mentions, Gujarat's experience cannot be faithfully replicated in other states - say Bengal, Orissa. However, ownership of land allows a rural farmer bargaining power. The land could be sold, mortgaged or used in any way fit to push up one's credit. Land that remains in agriculture then needs to be efficiently used to push up yield - India's yield being only 30% of the average highest world yield.
As India's GDP grows, people inevitably move from the primary sectors (Agriculture, mining or foresting typically) to secondary (manufacturing) and tertiary (services) sectors. Accordingly the contribution of the primary sector to the GDP goes lower as a country's economy grows. As economics plays itself out, land ownership rights will be quintessential to allow the rural poor to move into other sectors and partake of a bigger piece of the pie.
I'll hopefully follow up with the kind of initiatives that could be taken to resolve land ownership disputes in the Indian context.
